We reported how Shea Ryan died on July 16, 2020, when he climbed through an unsecured fence on a building site in Drumchapel, Glasgow, and fell 20ft down a manhole shaft.
David Swanney, representing Shea’s mother Joanne Ferguson, opened the second day of a Fatal Accident Inquiry (FAI) at Glasgow Sheriff Court by questioning Robert Van Beek, who had been contracts manager with construction firm RJ McLeod at the time of the incident.
READ MORE: Building site where boy, 10, died ‘should have had more CCTV’
READ MORE: Death of Shea Ryan at Drumchapel building site to be investigated
Stuart Laurence (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA)
Mr Swanney asked the 62-year-old about the area of the site where the Scottish Water manhole in which Shea died – which was known as MH22 – was located.
He explained it was on an area of the site known as the Garscadden Burn Area (GBA) which had been operated by a company called ABV until July 3, 2020, when RJ McLeod, which had been putting in drainage works at the rest of the site since March, took on responsibility for it.
READ MORE: Glasgow boy Shea Ryan’s mum speaks out after his death
Mr Swanney told the inquiry it was “a matter of public record” that there had been five reports of unauthorised access on the GBA between April and June before RJ McLeod took it over.
He told the inquiry on one occasion on May 20, a report by site security contractors Prime Security stated fence panels at a play park next to the site had been “pushed over”, and CCTV had filmed youths on the site.
On another occasion on June 13, he said, two youths were caught on CCTV standing on top of earth-moving vehicles.
On the last reported incident on June 17, he said, the site security guard reported having come under attack from children aged between five and 13, who were throwing stones at him and trying to set fire to his jacket.
Shea Ryan (Image: PA)
According to the report, he said, this was a “nightly occurrence” and two members of the public had to intervene to help the man.
Mr Swanney reminded Mr Van Beek that RJ McLeod had implemented extra security measures after Shea’s death, and asked him: “If you were aware of the unauthorised access incidents between April and June 2020, you would have implemented those measures before you took over the site on July 3?”
READ MORE: Glasgow boy died after falling through manhole cover
Mr Swanney replied that they would have put in “a more active form of security” involving CCTV cameras and additional fencing, as the GBA would have been considered “high risk”.
Mr Van Beek told the inquiry he had met the site manager to discuss security arrangements for GBA a few weeks before the takeover, and that he also visited the site on July 2.
He said he had checked the fences during that visit, and that “all the fencing was double-clipped as far as I could see, and there were no panels missing”.
(Image: Newsquest)
Sheriff Stuart Reid asked whether he had seen the Scottish Water manholes, including MH22, during any of his visits to GBA and he said: “I don’t recall.”
He explained that the Scottish Water manholes on GBA were part of a different drainage system from the one RJ McLeod was working on and that their work “didn’t involve accessing MH22, which had nothing to do with it”.
Sheriff Reid asked him whether “RJ McLeod staff had any reason to access MH22 for the purposes of their work at GBA?”
“No,” Mr Van Beek said, “unless they wanted to check the depth,” adding it wouldn’t have been unusual to check conditions across the whole site.
Mr Van Beek added that, at the time of the handover, he had thought the manholes were finished, and it was company policy to cover unfinished manholes with a “ballast bag” weighing between half a tonne and a tonne, which he said could be “taken off if there’s more work to do”.
Mr Van Beek also told the court he did not know whether ABV had been specifically asked about instances of unauthorised access prior to the handover, explaining that he had not been at the meeting with them.
He was asked by procurator fiscal depute Nicola Gillespie whether RJ McLeod should have done an additional risk assessment when taking over a new area of the site anyway, given it had not been covered by their original construction phase plan where security arrangements were set out.
Mr Van Beek acknowledged that “with the benefit of hindsight, yes,” but added that he did not know “every single risk assessment that was done”.
READ MORE: Date set for investigation into death of Drumchapel boy who fell down manhole
Mr Swanney then asked Mr Van Beek about “any other cases of unauthorised access” at the GBA between the point they took it over on July 3 and Shea’s death, adding there had been a report of side windows having been smashed on an 18-tonne site vehicle, a camera stolen and a fence panel “trashed”.
Mr Van Beek responded that, at the time, he had only been aware of the smashed windows, and the only area of particular concern had been at a point on the site known as Bund B, where a footpath through the site had been fenced off.
He said the fences at this point were regularly damaged and, on one occasion before July 3, “we had an incident of trespassing overnight, fences were pulled down”.
Following this, he said, the company reinforced the area with timber stakes and ropes, “to reduce the likelihood of the fences being pushed over or pulled over,” and that while the panels were subsequently damaged there was no evidence of unauthorised access after this.
(Image: Newsquest)
He said when taking over the GBA the company installed triangular fencing along the footpath through the site, which “per the contract” they had to keep open, to make it “more robust”.
However, he said a play area off the footpath only had single fencing, telling the inquiry: “We didn’t make any special arrangements or measures in relation to that swing park other than the general fencing we had in that area.”
The inquiry continues.
