Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a series of public spending cuts yesterday, including the cancellation of the A27 Arundel Bypass project. This decision follows a review prompted by £1 billion in unfunded transport commitments for the upcoming year.

The proposed bypass, which was to extend approximately 4.9 miles with a new dual carriageway from Crossbush to Fontwell roundabouts, was expected to cost at least £320 million. It aimed to alleviate congestion, shorten travel times, and enhance safety, according to National Highways.

Reeves stated that the government would halt other projects as well, including A303 work involving a dual carriageway tunnel in a World Heritage Site and plans to reopen closed railway lines. The government deemed these schemes as “low value” and “unaffordable,” with a total projected cost of £587 million for next year.

RAC head of policy Simon Williams expressed concern over the budget cuts, questioning when improvements to Britain’s deteriorating roads would begin. He criticized the cancellation of the A27 Arundel Bypass, noting that the allocated £320 million for pothole repairs was insufficient to address the broader issue.

The bypass has faced significant opposition and delays over the years, with the previous government postponing it to 2025. Dr. Emma Tristram, Secretary of the Arundel Bypass Neighbourhood Committee, welcomed the cancellation, citing potential environmental harm and community impact. She suggested reconsidering a smaller-scale alternative proposed by locals, though emphasized that increasing car space is not a viable solution due to climate concerns.

Countryside charity CPRE Sussex praised the decision, calling it a “win for Sussex” and advocating for lower-impact, congestion-reducing measures as part of a comprehensive transport plan that includes public transport, walking, and cycling.

However, MP Andrew Griffith criticized the decision, arguing that rural communities will suffer due to Labour’s planning approach. He condemned the cancellation, suggesting it would lead to continued congestion and pollution without offering alternative solutions or funding.
Source link

[Featured]

[Just In]

Share.
Leave A Reply

© 2024 The News Times UK. Designed and Owned by The News Times UK.
Exit mobile version